Night of the Wild (2015)

GENRESAction,Horror,Sci-Fi,Thriller
LANGEnglish
ACTOR
Rob MorrowKelly RutherfordTristin MaysMary Risener
DIRECTOR
Eric Red

SYNOPSICS

Night of the Wild (2015) is a English movie. Eric Red has directed this movie. Rob Morrow,Kelly Rutherford,Tristin Mays,Mary Risener are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2015. Night of the Wild (2015) is considered one of the best Action,Horror,Sci-Fi,Thriller movie in India and around the world.

In a seemingly quiet town a mysterious meteor shower produces a sinister green meteorite that seems to have a dangerous effect on the dogs that who once were the kind well-behaved dogs we once knew turn into vicious killers and the residents are forced to engage in a battle of man vs beast as man's best friend turns into their worst enemy and one teenage girl named Roslyn has to fight her way through the vicious canines accompanied by her faithful dog shemp they must find a way to survive against the dogs they once called man's best friend

Night of the Wild (2015) Reviews

  • A warning, not a review.

    andreask-071742015-12-25

    I'm actually an hour and fourteen minutes into this movie while writing this. A brief summary; a meteor lands in a small town turning all the dogs into crazed killers and the people into mindless idiots. This movie is not scary, only annoying. Horrible plot, horrible acting and horrible characters. I really don't care if any of these people survive. I'll watch it to the end only because it's been a long day and I'm too tired to care. But please don't make the same mistake I've made and stay far away from this one. Watch the Green Inferno instead, at least it had some laughs. It mercifully just ended, one of the worst movies ever. Pray there will not be a sequel.

  • Cats!!!

    ronaldt492017-06-10

    Did any of the good citizens see the cats high up in the trees? Generally dogs don't climb trees. Cats do. These cats had enough sense to get as high above the ground as possible! If I look up and see hundreds of cats in a local tree they'll soon have company. ME!! And no entry here has mentioned the cats!

  • BAD even by Asylums standards!

    djmrmusic2016-07-23

    I am a twisted individual that watches all Asylum Movies, more times than not they are so bad that I enjoy them... THIS is NOT one of them. there is NO plot and NO story line, A meteor lands and turn all the dogs into man eating (I'd say monsters, but they are still just) dogs... then it's just 90 minutes of dogs trying to eat/kill people. there is no explanation, no reason, no conclusion, it's just a really bad movie. again, I am a FAN of Asylum movies, but THIS is just complete garbage, do not waste your time, there is NOTHING see hear unless you like to see dogs attack humans for 90 minutes... That is literally all this movie is... LITERALLY!!

  • everyone deserved to die

    khrob2015-10-04

    with as many stupid characters and worst writing this was a must watch to see how awful it would become. Virtually all of the characters in this movie should die and fall victim to natural selection weeding out inferior species and animals. Rooting for all of these idiots to die became my ultimate priority. If movie makers can't do better than this they should quit making movies, I must write ten lines to make it printable, are they serious????? with as many stupid characters and worst writing this was a must watch to see how awful it would become. Virtually all of the characters in this movie should die and fall victim to natural selection weeding out inferior species and animals. Rooting for all of these idiots to die became my ultimate priority. If movie makers can't do better than this they should quit making movies, I must write ten lines to make it printable, are they serious?????

  • That's a lotta mutts!

    rushknight2016-01-05

    By Asylum's standards, this movie is a triumph. Since almost all Asylum films feature terrible CGI and brazenly atrocious acting, this film sets itself somewhat apart as it is a bit higher quality. I didn't say it was good. Just better than the average Asylum feature. Asylum movies are characterized by a formulaic construction using an outlandish plot, poor acting, egregious errors in common sense, and insultingly horrific computer animation. So what did "Night of the Wild" bring us? Outlandish plot. Check. We got it here. A meteorite crashes, causing all the canines from every quaint little hamlet in the county to converge upon one little town and maul every happy citizen with a sleeve. Great, I love it. It's nice to see that the townsfolk won't let a few glowing rocks from the heavens stop them from going about their town-ish business. Then comes the acting. Absolutely sub par, but not to the point of being distracting from the movie's action. I'm traditionally very easy on the actors of such films since I don't think anyone can really save a bad movie movie by eloquently delivering poorly written dialogue. What it comes down to is staying in character, and the actors managed it well enough. I'm sure others here will be happy to rip the acting apart, but frankly I don't see much to comment on here one way or the other. Next, we get some absolutely ridiculous distortions of common sense. I mean of course that the characters, when faced with disaster, seem to choose the most obviously insipid course of action available to them, every time, without fail. For many viewers of this genre, herein lies our blessed entertainment. Lastly, the aforementioned terrible CGI. I'm happy to report that for most of the movie, this element is lacking almost entirely. It seems that when faced with a plot line that does not involve mutated fusions of various reptiles and sea creatures, hideously gooey and slimy otherworldly visitors, spectacularly impossible or improbable natural catastrophes and/or large robots, the Asylum studio has enough presence of mind to actually reject hastily constructed and unconvincing computer animation. Or so I had hoped.. Unfortunately by the end of the film it became apparent that the budget was running short and they had to finish the movie in a hurry, so they filmed the car ride and the plane ride in a studio (you never get to see the vehicles moving), recycled and misplaced a scene or two (the blood and makeup mysteriously vanished for about 8 seconds), and then finally surrendered to the urge to do what they do best: add some hastily constructed and unconvincing computer animation. A patchwork finish if I've ever seen one. (Spoiler, the ending credits are apparently ashamed of themselves because they zip up at a truly confounding speed. I knew I should have taken that speed-reading course in college.) Altogether the movie was still entertaining, and in my humble opinion a good move in the right direction for the Asylum studio. It earns one of my higher Asylum movie scores. More please.

Hot Search