King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table (2017)

King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table (2017)

GENRESAction,Adventure,Crime,Fantasy,Sci-Fi,Thriller
LANGEnglish
ACTOR
Sara Malakul LaneEoin O'BrienAlexander WintersKelly B. Jones
DIRECTOR
Jared Cohn

SYNOPSICS

King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table (2017) is a English movie. Jared Cohn has directed this movie. Sara Malakul Lane,Eoin O'Brien,Alexander Winters,Kelly B. Jones are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2017. King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table (2017) is considered one of the best Action,Adventure,Crime,Fantasy,Sci-Fi,Thriller movie in India and around the world.

In medieval England, Merlin and King Arthur banish the evil enchantress Morgana and her son Mordred to the ends of the universe as Morgana vows revenge. In present day, Knights descendant Penn doesn't take much stock in the legends of his supposed ancestors, even as the descendants meet in Thailand to practice fighting. But when Morgana and her son return to earth, armed with alien technology and hell-bent on destroying every last descendant of King Arthur and his knights, Penn must to come to terms with who he was born to be, and bring together the new Knights of the Round Table to save themselves and the earth from Morgana's total vengeance.

More

King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table (2017) Reviews

  • Terrible Camera Work And Acting At Its Best

    niaz_islam2017-06-04

    It was pretty hard to decide what is the main base of this film. It has myth, magic, karate, spaceship, science, robot, weapons both swords and guns. Maybe the script writer did not want to leave out anything, so he put all the things he can think of in it. And the screenplay is so hilarious that they could even add sound of passing shooting star as if one can hear it from earth. And the story also does not make any sense, simple things were happening in a complicated way. This kind of script needs a bit of comedy in it to lighten up the viewers mind as the scenes hardly made any sense. But there was not a shred of comedy. The camera work, was out of the world or should I say out of the frame. Horrible camera work, full of close angle shots. There were hardly any wide angle shots. Seems a lot like amateur work. Lastly, the acting. The acting was another horrible aspect of this film. The acting could not be more obvious than this. There was no emotion, expression or charisma at all. In some scenes it seemed like that they just have to deliver the dialogue somehow and move on to the next scenes. There was no commitment to the roles. And the dialogues were full of awkward unnecessary pauses. Do yourself a favor, don't watch this movie. NOT RECOMMENDED.

    More
  • A less than legendary return

    TheLittleSongbird2018-04-03

    Now 'King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table' had a decent idea and did have the potential to work. Really liked the idea of turning the story and characters on their heads, not something novel in any kind of media but it was hard not to be intrigued by it. Part of me was nervous though considering the less than favourable (putting that kindly) reception. A reception that, after seeing 'King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table', is justified. Was hoping to find some kind of value, being an encouraging generally reviewer, but 'King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table' really is that bad. It completely wastes its concept by trying to do far too much in the writing, but it is the very amateur hour execution in every area that brings it down so catastrophically. 'King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table' looks terrible. The costumes wouldn't even pass for fancy dress, even bargain bin quality clothes look better. The effects and such are shoddy. Worst of all are the utterly chaotic photography and editing that is enough to make one physically ill, had to lie after the film to stop myself from getting more queasy. The over-obvious and discordant music doesn't appeal at all and a lot of the sound gives one the creeps. The script is really embarrassingly cheesy and stilted. Meanwhile the story is an over-crowded kitchen sink of different tones. Far too many and none handled well, it does affect the coherence (which badly suffers throughout) and it gives the sense that the film didn't know what it wanted to be, what direction to take and who to aim it at. Found nothing interesting or endearing about any of the characters, all of which have no traits other than dull or obnoxious. The acting is wooden and passionless, only Sara Lane tries and even she isn't very credible as a result of trying to carry the film single-handedly (something she struggles with). Overall, terrible. 1/10 Bethany Cox

    More
  • One star is too generous

    rpwoolford20032018-03-23

    This movie is so bad, I wish there was a way to give it a negative star rating.

  • Ridiculous!

    magpie2212018-08-05

    The start was rubbish but watched for another 10 minutes and it just got weird. Deleted and won't bother again. Neither should you!

  • Don't bother!

    lyons7382018-03-08

    This movie is a waste of time. This was like watching a low budget college film, the script was cheesy and the camera cutaways were horrible. If you start watching this movie you either are a glutton for punishment, or you are in search of the worst movie made.

Hot Search